23) Poona Pact & GOI 1935
๐๏ธ YEAR 1932: Controversy & The Great Compromise โ๏ธ
- August 16, 1932: The Communal Award ๐
- Announcement by PM Ramsay MacDonald.
- Granting of Separate Electorates to Depressed Classes, Muslims, Sikhs, and others.
- The "Double Vote" system for Dalits. โ๏ธ
- September 20, 1932: Gandhiโs Protest โ๏ธ
- Mahatma Gandhi begins an "Indefinite Fast" in Yerwada Jail.
- Opposition to the "vivisection" of Hindu society.
- September 24, 1932: The Poona Pact ๐ค
- The historic agreement between Ambedkar and Gandhi.
- Abandonment of Separate Electorates for Reserved Seats in Joint Electorates.
- September 1932: All India Anti-Untouchability League ๐งน
- Founded by Gandhi to start social reform from within.
- November โ December 1932: 3rd Round Table Conference ๐๏ธ
- Boycotted by Congress and the Labour Party.
- Final discussions on the upcoming constitutional framework.
๐๏ธ YEAR 1933: The Roadmap to Reform ๐ค๏ธ
- January 1933: Launch of the "Harijan" Weekly ๐ฐ
- Gandhi begins his campaign for the upliftment of the Depressed Classes.
- March 1933: The White Paper ๐
- The British Government publishes its proposals for constitutional reforms in India.
- April 1933: Joint Select Committee Formed ๐ฅ
- Chaired by Lord Linlithgow to review the White Paper proposals.
- November 1933: The Harijan Tour Begins ๐ถโโ๏ธ
- Gandhi starts a nationwide tour (lasting until July 1934) to eradicate untouchability.
๐๏ธ YEAR 1934: Review and Refinement ๐
- May & August 1934: Gandhiโs Penance Fasts ๐
- Short fasts undertaken to convince followers of the seriousness of the Harijan campaign.
- November 1934: The Joint Select Committee Report ๐
- The committee submits its findings, which become the basis for the 1935 Bill.
- Opposition from conservative "diehards" like Winston Churchill. ๐ฃ๏ธ
๐๏ธ YEAR 1935: The Birth of the New Constitution ๐ฎ๐ณ
- February 1935: Introduction of the Bill ๐ณ๏ธ
- The Government of India Bill is introduced in the House of Commons.
- August 2, 1935: The Government of India Act 1935 โ
- The Bill receives Royal Assent and becomes law.
- Key Provisions of the Act: ๐๏ธ
- All India Federation: Proposed union of British provinces and Princely States.
- Provincial Autonomy: Removal of Dyarchy in provinces; replaced by responsible government. ๐
- Dyarchy at the Centre: Introduced for "Reserved" and "Transferred" subjects.
- Bicameralism: Creation of the Council of States and Federal Assembly.
- The Reaction: ๐
- J. Nehru: Calls it a "Charter of Slavery." โ๏ธ
- M.A. Jinnah: Rejects it as "thoroughly rotten." ๐
๐๏ธ 1. The Communal Award (August 16, 1932) ๐
The story begins with the Communal Award, announced by British Prime Minister Ramsay MacDonald.
- What was it? It was a proposal based on the findings of the Lothian Committee (Indian Franchise Committee).
- The Provision: It granted separate electorates not just for Muslims, Sikhs, and Christians, but also for depressed classes (Dalits) and even Marathas in Bombay.
- The Goal: It treated the depressed classes as a "minority" separate from the Hindu community.
โ๏ธ 2. The Conflict at the Round Table Conference ๐ฃ๏ธ
- Ambedkarโs Demand: During the Second Round Table Conference, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar fought hard for separate electorates to ensure the depressed classes had a guaranteed political voice.
- Gandhiโs Rejection: Mahatma Gandhi strongly opposed this. He believed that separate electorates would permanently divide the Hindu community and "vivisect" India.
- The British Mediation: Since the Indian delegates couldn't reach a consensus, Ramsay MacDonald stepped in as a mediator, resulting in the Communal Award. ๐ฌ๐ง
โ๏ธ 3. The Main Provisions of the Award ๐ณ๏ธ
- Groups included: Muslims, Europeans, Sikhs, Indian Christians, Anglo-Indians, depressed classes, and women.
- Double Vote: The depressed classes were to get a "double vote"โone to be used in a separate electorate and another in the general electorate. โ๏ธ
- Duration: This arrangement was intended to last for 20 years.
- Depressed classes to be declared the status of minority
- in the province of bombay, 7 seats were to be allocated for teh mahraths.
๐ค 4. The Poona Pact (September 24, 1932) โจ
Gandhi, who was in Yerwada Jail at the time, went on an indefinite fast to protest the separate electorates for Dalits. This created immense pressure on Ambedkar to reach a compromise.
- The Agreement: Signed by Ambedkar and Gandhi (represented by Madan Mohan Malaviya and others).
- The Outcome: The idea of separate electorates for depressed classes was abandoned. Instead, they were given reserved seats within a joint electorate. ๐ค
- reservation in govt jobs.
- Significance: It was a formal recognition by upper-class Hindus that the depressed classes were the most discriminated section of society and needed a political voice.
๐ 5. Impact and Criticism of the Pact โ๏ธ
While the Pact saved Gandhi's life and maintained Hindu unity, it had mixed results:
- Political Tools: Some argue the Pact turned Dalit leaders into "political tools" of the majoritarian caste Hindu organizations. ๐ ๏ธ
- Constitutional Rights: Critics suggest that by refusing to recognize Dalits as a "separate element," the Pact pre-empted stronger safeguards in the future Constitution.
๐งน 6. Gandhiโs "Harijan" Campaign ๐ถโโ๏ธ
Post-Pact, Gandhi dedicated himself to the welfare of Dalits, whom he called "Harijans" (Children of God).
- Internal Reform: He urged Harijans to focus on education, hygiene, and giving up liquor/beef.
- Organizations: He founded the All India Anti-Untouchability League and the Harijan Sevak Sangh.
- Harijan Tour (1933-34): Gandhi traveled across India to stress that "Hinduism dies if untouchability lives." He urged upper castes to do "penance" for centuries of oppression. ๐
๐ง 7. Ambedkar vs. Gandhi: Different Philosophies ๐ญ
- Ambedkarโs View: Caste was a political and structural issue. He believed Dalits needed equal voting rights and independent representation to achieve the "full potential of democracy." ๐ณ๏ธ
- Gandhiโs View: Caste was a social and moral issue. He believed in a "change of heart" for the oppressors and worked with upper castes to change their mindset through reform. โค๏ธ๐ฉน
๐ 8. Concluding Remarks & Bitterness ๐ฅ
Despite the Pact, Ambedkar grew increasingly disillusioned with Gandhi and the Congress.
- 1945 Allegation: Ambedkar claimed Congress nullified the pact by choosing "less qualified" candidates who were dependent on the party.
- The Famous Quote: In a 1955 BBC interview, Ambedkar called Gandhiโs stand a "huge whim." He famously stated: "As a politician, he was never a Mahatma. I refuse to call him Mahatma." ๐ค
Summary: While the Poona Pact prevented a formal political split in Hinduism, it left a lasting legacy of debate over how best to achieve social justice and political representation for the marginalized in India. ๐ฎ๐ณโจ
The Government of India Act 1935
๐๏ธ 1. The Prelude: 3rd Round Table Conference (1932)
Before the Act was born, the third and final Round Table Conference took place.
- The No-Shows: The Indian National Congress and the British Labour Party boycotted it. ๐ซ
- The Participants: Indian States were represented by various Dewans (Hyderabad, Mysore, Baroda, etc.), while British-Indian representatives included B.R. Ambedkar, Muhammad Iqbal, and the Aga Khan III. ๐ค
- The Outcome: The conference was largely a setback due to the absence of major leaders, but it provided the basis for the reforms that led to the 1935 Act.
๐ 2. Background & Passage of the Act
- Simon Commission Failure: The earlier Simon Commission wasn't accepted by Congress. ๐
- White Paper (1933): The British Government issued a "White Paper" containing proposed reforms.
- Joint Select Committee: Chaired by Lord Linlithgow, this committee reviewed the proposals for 1.5 years. Winston Churchill and other conservatives actually opposed many parts of it! ๐ฃ๏ธ
- Royal Assent: The Bill was finally passed and became law on August 2, 1935. โ
๐ The Dual Power Structure (London vs. India)
๐๏ธ London Side (The British Authority)
- The Power Center: Policy-making and ultimate control.
- The Monarch & Parliament: The source of legal authority.
- Secretary of State (SOS):
- Established via GOI Act 1858.
- Controlled Indian affairs from London.
- Note: The Council of India (his advisory body) was abolished by the 1935 Act and replaced by a team of advisors. โ
- High Commissioner for India: Created in 1919, took over some administrative duties.
๐ฎ๐ณ Indian Side (The Administration)
- Capital: Delhi (Shifted from Calcutta in 1911/12 ๐ฐ).
- Viceroy (Governor General): The Executive head in India.
- Bicameralism: (Established 1919, refined 1935)
- Upper House: Council of State.
- Lower House: Legislative Assembly.
provisions of the Act
๐๏ธ 1. The All-India Federation
The Act proposed a federation consisting of British Provinces and Princely States.
โ๏ธ Structure of the Federal Legislature
| Feature | ๐๏ธ Upper House (Council of State) | ๐ข Lower House (Federal Assembly) |
|---|---|---|
| Total Members | 260 | 375 |
| Princely States | 104 (Nominated) | 125 (Nominated) |
| British Provinces | 156 (Indirect Election) | 250 (Direct Election) |
| Nature | Permanent body | 5-year term |
The Federation never came into existence because the Princely States refused to join (despite the Chamber of Princes setup in 1921). They feared losing their autonomy. ๐ โโ๏ธ
๐ 2. Executive: Dyarchy at the Centre
The 1935 Act moved Dyarchy from the Provinces to the Centre. ๐
- ๐ด Reserved List (Full British Control):
- Controlled by: Viceroy + Executive Council.
- Subjects: Defence, External Affairs, Police, Home Affairs, Bureaucracy.
- ๐ข Transferred List (Partial Indian Control):
- Controlled by: Viceroy + Council of Ministers (responsible to the Legislature).
- Subjects: Trade, Health, Forest, Education.
๐๏ธ 3. Provincial Autonomy (The Big Change)
The Act marked a major shift in how provinces were governed.
- Dyarchy Abolished: No more "Reserved/Transferred" split at the provincial level. ๐ ๏ธ
- Internal Autonomy: Provinces became autonomous units of administration.
- Responsible Government: The Governor was required to act on the advice of Ministers responsible to the Provincial Legislature. ๐ค
- Overriding Powers: Beware! The Governor still held "special responsibilities" and could override ministers if necessary. ๐ง
๐ณ๏ธ 4. Political Representation & Electorates
The British continued the policy of "Divide and Rule" through separate electorates. ๐
- Continued for: Muslims, Sikhs, Christians, and Anglo-Indians.
- Expanded to: Depressed Classes (Scheduled Castes), Women, and Labour.
- Poona Pact (1932) Context: Influenced how seats were reserved for depressed classes within the joint electorate rather than purely separate ones. ๐
๐ฆ 5. Major Institutional Foundations
The 1935 Act laid the groundwork for modern Indian institutions:
- Reserve Bank of India (RBI): Established to control currency and credit of the country. ๐ธ
- Federal Court: Established in 1937 (The predecessor to todayโs Supreme Court). ๐จโโ๏ธ
- Public Service Commissions: Federal, Provincial, and Joint PSCs for recruitment. ๐
๐ Summary: Final Understanding
| Feature | Status under 1935 Act |
|---|---|
| London Power | Secretary of State remains the boss; Council of India gone. |
| Centre | Dyarchy introduced (Reserved vs. Transferred). |
| Provinces | Dyarchy removed; Provincial Autonomy introduced. ๐ข |
| Federation | Proposed but failed (Princely States said "No thanks"). ๐ซ |
| Judiciary | Federal Court established. โ๏ธ |
| Banking | RBI established. ๐ฆ |
๐ 6. Significance of the Act
- Unification: It was the first serious attempt to create a "Federation of India." ๐ฎ๐ณ
- Democratization: It significantly increased the number of people who could vote.
- Reorganization of the state: It led to the partial reorganization of provinces to satisfy local aspirations.
- provincial autonomy: granting a large measure of autonomy to the provinces of india.
- emergency powers: giving the governors generals emergency powers.
๐ 7. Criticism & Famous Opinions
The Act received a very "lukewarm" response in India.
- British Control: It preserved British control in all vital areas. ๐โโ๏ธand still there was no full independence.
- Communal Divisions: It extended separate electorates, further dividing India along religious lines.
- Rigidity: It was a rigid document with no room for internal growth toward independence.
- lack of Indian involvement: the act received a lukewarm response in india because of the details of the bill and the lack of Indian involvement in drafting its contents.(INC)
What the Leaders said: ๐ฃ๏ธ
- Jawaharlal Nehru: Called it "a machine with strong brakes but no engine" and a "Charter of Slavery." ๐๐ซ
- M.A. Jinnah: Called it "thoroughly rotten, fundamentally bad, and totally unacceptable." ๐๐คข
- Rab Butler (British): Argued it set India on the path toward parliamentary democracy. ๐ค๏ธ
Summary: The 1935 Act was the longest Act of the British Parliament at the time. While it offered "Autonomy" to provinces, the "Brakes" held by the Governor-General ensured that the British remained firmly in the driver's seat. ๐๐๏ธ